On the 25th May 2018 I wrote Newsletter 199 titled ‘The Sydney Morning Herald Providing False and Misleading Information about Flu Vaccines’. This was sent to the SMH editor for a response and on the 4th June 2018 the SMH published this article titled ”Flu vaccines ‘do little’, wear face mask instead says health expert.’

In this article Dr. Chris Del Mar, Professor of Public Health at Bond University states “the influenza vaccine has been oversold in Australia” and this push by the Australian government ‘with a “weak” (flu) vaccine is overshadowing effective prevention methods such as hand-washing and mask-wearing’.

Further, Dr. Tony Baratone, president of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), states “that the influenza vaccine is not as effective as a number of other vaccines” yet this information is not being publlcly debated and this has resulted in the Australian government recommending the mandating of the flu vaccine for all healthcare workers in aged-care facilities.

This has been adopted in some states even though the Australian government, the Medical Board of Australia (MBA) and the AMA have not provided any evidence to support this policy.

Whilst it is claimed in the mainstream media that there was a horror flu season last year, the AMA has not revealed that there was also a high uptake of the flu vaccine in 2017 (higher than previous years because of the advertising campaign) nor has it provided the number of people vaccinated with the flu vaccine last year that still got hospitalised with flu. 

The media and the AMA are being permitted to make claims about vaccines to the public without providing the evidence to support these claims and without publicising an accurate number of the deaths and injuries that are occurring to vaccines – or revealing the ingredients that are injected into the tissues with each vaccine.

The breaches of human rights and discrimination in the government’s No Jab No Pay / Play (NJNP/P) policies are described in my webinar that is published on the Australian Naturopathic Practitioner’s Association website.

The webinair is titled “Informed Consent to Vaccination in Australia by Judy Wilyman PhD” and it describes why Australia’s national immunisation program (NIP) that is promoted by the Medical Board of Australia is not a ‘protective’ public health policy.

The NJNP/P policies are damaging human health and the genetics of the Australian population because they are not evaluated on the health of the population. In 1995 it was decided by the GAVI alliance (private-public partnerships including the Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies) that global vaccination programs would be evaluated on the immunisation uptake in the population.

Hence doctors and consumers in Australia are paid to vaccinate to ‘raise the immunisation rates’ based on the assumption that this improves the health of the population – no proof is provided that this is the case because the statistics support the opposite conclusion.

Did you know that chronic illness and autism has escalated 5 -10 fold since the 1990’s when the NIP expanded? But the Australian government is not required to acknowledge or publicise this fact because they do not assess the success of these programs on population or children’s health.

The evidence for these facts are presented in my webinar describing the crime against humanity that is being committed by the Australian government with its current vaccination program and in my PhD thesis that is published by the University of Wollongong.

Despite the fact that every other professional or parent who attempts to present the science questioning the effectiveness of vaccines is shut-down in the mainstream media as “anti-vaccination” the Sydney Morning Herald has decided to publish Dr. Chris Del Mar’s comments without labelling them as ‘anti-vaccination’. I wonder what has caused this change of strategy? (See this link for the explanation).

The public needs to demand that the Medical Board of Australia and the Australian Government provide:

  1. The definition of the term ‘anti-vaccination’ that they are using to direct health practitioners to promote government vaccination policies to maintain their medical registration? How can doctors and health practitioners put their patient’s interests first if they are not permitted to discuss the risks of vaccination without being deregistered from their profession?
  2. Why does the Royal Australian College of Physicians (RACP), that has thousands of members in Australia, have an official position of supporting fully informed parental consent to vaccination without financial coercion, but it is not required to enforce this position (that is embedded in all international human rights covenants and good medical practice guidelines) with its members? This situation is allowing the MBA to de-register doctors / nurses who present the risks of vaccines to their patients, by describing these risks as ‘anti-vaccination’. This is not in their patient’s best interest and this is breaching the MBA’s own medical code of conduct guidelines. It is also a situation that does not protect public health in genetically diverse populations.  

There is extreme anxiety and concern in the Australian community regarding the suppression of the scientific debate on vaccination and the removal of the public’s voice in government policy.

The Sydney Vaccination Conference will be held from 1-5 pm on Saturday 30 June 2018 with many independent speakers that are listed on this link to the tickets for this event. Places are limited so please get in early for a chance to hear from independent researchers and citizens explaning why this debate is being censored in Australia, and globally, and why these government vaccination policies cannot protect our health.

Judy Wilyman PhD
Bachelor of Science, University of NSW
Diploma of Education (Science), University of Wollongong
Master of Science (Population Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong.
PhD in The Science and Politics of the Australian Government’s Vaccination Program, UOW School of Humanities and Social Inquiry.