In 2009 the WHO declared a ‘pandamic’ of a new strain of influenza – Swine Flu 2009. However, in order to create a ‘pandemic’ the WHO had to implement political structures that would give them the power to control the populations of member countries before the pandemic was called. These political structures are described in detail in Ch.10 of my book or PhD thesis, however I will provide a summary in point form of the major events needed for an elite group of practitioners/individuals to use medical knowledge to protect their own vested interests in the development of pharmaceutical products:
- The professional body must have control over diagnosing disease and death. This gives them the power to protect their vested interest. This is a grey area of science where many co-factors can contribute to the cause of disease/death and the final decision can be subjective – not objective. This gives the elite power over the lives of individuals if they control this science.
- Promote new strains of influenza viruses using ‘fear’. For example, in 2009 the new strain of influenza was part human H1N1, part bird and part pig. However, the media called this “swine-flu 2009” even though the strain was never endemic in pigs. The first case of the influenza in pigs was thought to be transmitted from humans to pigs. Scientists have the technology to genetically engineer viruses and we are now using many genetically engineered vaccines.
- Use the mainstream media to make the population fearful that humans will have little or no resistance to the virus. This was done in 2009 despite the fact that swine-flu 2009 contained part human strain H1N1 that is the most common strain of influenza found in humans and many people had immunity to this strain.
- Publicise all cases where the virus has been detected. That is, set up surveillance stations everywhere and notify the community of every case of the virus found in the population – even if the infection does not cause any disease, or serious disease in the person. These are called the ‘notifications’ of a disease (incidence in the population) and this statistic is not indicative of a true pandemic because you are publicising ‘cases’ of infection that may never have any symptoms and/or is not serious and would otherwise go undetected.
- Make sure you change the defintion of a pandemic so that you can call a ‘pandemic’ even when the new virus is not causing serious harm to most of the population. The WHO changed the definition of a ‘pandemic’ in May 2009.
- The new definition removed the following clause: “A pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears …resulting in epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness……” A ‘pandemic’ in 2020 can be called simply if “A disease epidemic occurs whenthere are more cases of that disease than normal.” In this definition a “case” is defined as the presence of the virus (infection) in the person without any symptoms of disease.
So a pandemic in 2020 can be called simply on the detection of the virus in the person – no serious symptoms required – and this gives the elite, with vested interests in these policies, the power to control populations.
The WHO has sleeping contracts in place with its member countries and these require them to follow a set of actions when a ‘pandemic’ is called. Australia has been the first to pull this trigger in 2020 and call a ‘pandemic’ based only on notifications of this strain of virus in the population. This has set off a train of events that are frightening the population and are costing the country billions of dollars. The fact that medical practitioners control the diagnosis of disease and death – without accountablility – will ensure that this ‘pandemic’ will succeed.
The WHO prepared themselves for this ‘pandemic’ for decades by putting political structures in place and Bill Gates, a significant contributer to the WHO’s political decisions on vaccines through the GAVI alliance, was able to predict this ‘pandemic’, even to its place of origin in China before anyone had heard of the ‘novel coronaviris – COVID-19′ that suddenly emerged in January 2020.
The WHO is now stating that “….as the World Health Organisation classes the latest coronavirus outbreak as a global health emergency, the race is on to find a vaccine.”
The ethical code of medical conduct set by the World Medical Association (WMA) states that doctors must not use their knowledge to remove human rights yet western governments and medical practitioners are now violating this conduct with pandemic policies that allow them to protect their vested interests in these policies and to control human behaviour.
This is called a medical tyranny and every country needs legislation in their constitution that prevents any profession from using the control of scientific knowledge to remove human rights and control human behaviour (Benjamin Rush stated this in the US in 1788).
Humans are not living in a free society if they cannot control what is injected into their own bodies. It is time for the public on whom these policies are being enforced to make the governments and medical profession accountable for the public interest in these policies and not the vested interests of corporations, powerful media moguls and entrepeneurs.
Judy Wilyman PhD