• Do you know what’s in a vaccine?

    Do you know what’s in a vaccine?

    In a world where we are increasingly exposed to toxins and where our experts are increasingly depending upon industry funding, it is important to know that the information you are receiving is balanced, non-biased and evidence-based.
  • Your rights

    Your rights

    As a major stakeholder in immunisation policy, you have a right to be fully informed and to participate in the decision-making process.
  • Get involved

    Get involved

    This website provides information that will enable you to participate in discussions and decisions about government strategies to reduce infectious diseases.


Welcome: This site has been set up to assist the public to make informed decisions about vaccination. Governments globally are recommending the use of multiple vaccines in infants to prevent infectious diseases yet the long-term health effects of the combined schedule of vaccines has never been tested for safety.

The proof that vaccines have not been adequately tested for safety and efficacy is provided in my PhD thesis published by the University of Wollongong. My thesis concludes that the Australian government has not proved that the National Immunisation Program (NIP), that recommends vaccines against 16 diseases, is not causing the significant increase in chronic illness (including autism) that has occurred simultaneously in children as the vaccination program has expanded.

My PhD thesis is titled “A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘ and it provides academic arguments that show the government’s schedule of vaccines is the most likely cause of the illnesses and many deaths that are being observed in todays children. To date the arguments I have provided have not been refuted with hard evidence and this is why the University of Wollongong is standing by this research. [Read more…]

Do you know what’s in a vaccine ?

Do you know what’s in a vaccine?

Our quality of life is dependent upon our health. In a world where we are increasingly exposed to toxins and where our experts are increasingly depending upon industry funding, it is important to know that the information you are receiving is balanced, non-biased and evidence-based. The ingredients of vaccines are not listed on the Immunise Australia Program (IAP) website where they can be easily found. They are found in the Appendix 3 of the Australian Immunisation Handbook (10th Ed). I have also provided a link to the ingredients listed on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website and the World Association for Vaccine Education website. [Read more…]


Help to maintain our right to informed consent for all medical interventions by contributing to this cause. This information has been provided from unfunded research and I have made it available on this website because it is in the public interest. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Please see the link below.

Australian Government Immunisation Policy

Australia’s National Immunisation Policy is not designed by the Australian government in response to Australian public health needs. Australia’s immunisation policy is based on recommendations provided by public-private partnerships within the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI). This is an alliance that includes pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation and  the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation etc. All partners have equal input into the recommendations for national vaccination programs. GAVI provides advice to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the recommended vaccines are then presented to the 193 WHO member countries.

Here is information about Australia’s National Immunisation Program (NIP) and the lack of evidence for its implementation. Over the last two decades parents have become increasingly concerned about the science supporting government immunisation policies as the chronic illness in Australian children has increased 5-fold. Over this time the recommended schedule of vaccines for children has expanded from 7 diseases in the late 1980’s to 16 plus diseases in 2014. This has led many parents and professionals to investigate the science of vaccines and to set up websites presenting information about the risks of this medical intervention to the public. Links to these websites can be accessed on the Pro-Choice In Vaccination page of this website. [Read more…] 

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Connect on Facebook


3 weeks ago

Judy Wilyman PhD Vaccination Choice


According to Fairfax journalist Kylar Loussikian, Dr Judy Wilyman has, “… no specific expertise in vaccination science.” The Sydney Morning Herald, 23.09.2018.

For your information, Kylar, Dr Judy Wilyman has, among other qualifications, a Master of Science degree in Population Health. This included a research project analysing the Australian Government’s Policy on Whooping Cough. Dr Wilyman has also completed a PhD on Australian Vaccination Policy, available on the University of Wollongong website.
Kylar Loussikian seems to have no specific expertise in investigative journalism, or any morals or ethics for that matter. His only qualification is a Media Degree from the University of NSW.

Expertise usually arises from a personal interest that stimulates one to study the background of a topic or issue, like a PhD.Standard degrees tend to qualify you to regurgitate the accepted position. It is shocking that journalists like Kylar are being presented with media awards, considering his articles that denigrate the academic research of professionals like Dr Wilyman.
Kylar also does not mention the important point that Australian doctors who agree with Dr Wilyman are at risk of losing their medical licenses. This threat has effectively gagged doctors from speaking out about vaccine issues.

Greg Hunt, Australian Federal Health Minister, said, “If it is accurate that there are registered doctors that are advocating an anti-vaccination position, then they will have the full force of the authorities come down on them.”
Herald Sun, 24.8.2017.

This was clearly demonstrated with the investigation of Dr John Piesse, not long after Greg Hunt made the above statement.

Kylar’s journalism is a thinly veiled piece of corporate pharmaceutical industry marketing. Its purpose is to destroy critics of their products. This has worked very effectively up until now. Independent voices on vaccines have been suffocated due to the powerful industry forces that control our government and media. See Elizabeth Hart’s presentation at The 2018 Sydney Vaccination Conference outlining all the industry conflicts of interest involved in Australia’s vaccination policy development.



Kylar’s past pieces against Dr Wilyman have also been constantly publicly praised by what have been described as ‘industry lobby groups’. Reasonable Hank, also known as Peter Tierney, is a well known member of both the Australian Skeptics and the Stop the AVN group. Reasonable Hank has been very vocal in his support of Kylar’s past articles and TV news interviews against Dr Wilyman. See tweets below.

Professor Brian Martin, University of Wollongong, has written a paper about the inaccuracies in Kylar’s past coverage of Dr Judy Wilyman’s thesis:

Another article by Professor Martin shows how Kylar’s incorrect journalism has been used by others to publicly defame Dr Wilyman’s research.

The powerful JP Morgan group also has a vested interest in the owner of the Sydney Morning Herald, Fairfax Media. JP Morgan group is the second biggest shareholder in Fairfax.

JP Morgan is closely aligned with pharmaceutical companies, particularly GlaxoSmithKline. The group is also openly invested in the global vaccine market.
If you connect the dots, controlling interests like JP Morgan have a major say at Fairfax Media’s Sydney Morning Herald, and ofcourse this would include influence over their journalists.

On 26 July 2018, Fairfax Media and Nine Entertainment Co announced they had agreed on terms for a merger between the two companies to become Australia’s largest media company. Shareholders in Nine Entertainment Co. will own 51.1 percent of the combined entity and Fairfax shareholders will own 48.9 percent.

The public would be better informed if they listened only to independent media sources. New players on the Australian media scene such as The Australian National Review are not connected with the pharmaceutical industry in any way.

#boycottfairfax #boycottmurdoch
... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook