• Do you know what’s in a vaccine?

    Do you know what’s in a vaccine?

    In a world where we are increasingly exposed to toxins and where our experts are increasingly depending upon industry funding, it is important to know that the information you are receiving is balanced, non-biased and evidence-based.
  • Your rights

    Your rights

    As a major stakeholder in immunisation policy, you have a right to be fully informed and to participate in the decision-making process.
  • Get involved

    Get involved

    This website provides information that will enable you to participate in discussions and decisions about government strategies to reduce infectious diseases.
Welcome

Welcome

This site has been set up to assist the public to make informed decisions about vaccination. Governments globally are recommending the use of multiple vaccines in infants to prevent infectious diseases yet the long-term health effects of the combined schedule of vaccines has never been tested for safety. Further, evidence has surfaced that shows the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the body that is responsible for protecting public health, was involved in covering up data that showed a causal link between vaccines and autism. This cover-up by CDC researchers has been revealed in the movie “VaxXed: from Cover-up to Catastrophe” that is now showing in Australia. For information about public viewings of VaxXed please click here and for a review of the documentary by Real News Australia click here – VaxXed Screenings Unchallenged Around Australia. I have also provided a review of the film by a general practitioner, VaxXed Stories: Patricia Ryan in Nebraska.

Many doctors and professionals are also presenting evidence showing that the vaccination schedule (and some specific vaccines e.g. HPV vaccines) have not been proven to be safe or effective. Chronic illness in children has significantly increased as the number of vaccines on the National Immunisation Program (NIP) has increased. It is now more important than ever to ask what is in a vaccine and what evidence do we have that using multiple vaccines in children is good for population health. These questions have been answered in my PhD thesis published on the University of Wollongong website which concludes that the Australian government has not proved that the National Immunisation Program is causing more good than harm in the Australian population. My thesis is titled “A critical analysis of the Australian government’s rationale for its vaccination policy‘. In Chapter 8 of my thesis I have described the “undone science” in this policy which means that the hard evidence has not been collected for the government to claim that the vaccination schedule is “safe and effective”. I have also included a chapter on the Industry Influence in Research and Policy, that shows the types of scientific studies, that are being funded by industry, to claim that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’. These epidemiological studies are inadequate for proving safety and efficacy because of flaws in their design. For example, inert placebos have not been used in most cases to determine the safety of vaccines. Here is a radio interview that explains the lack of scientific evidence underpinning the Australian government’s vaccination policies – Vaccines: A Critical Analysis by Dr. Judy Wilyman.

The Australian government is using a lack of evidence and industry funded surveillance of vaccine adverse events to claim that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’. This ‘science’ is now the basis for mandatory vaccination in Australian Social Welfare policies. Yet there is no public health legislation in any health act in Australia to support this measure. Conscientious and religious objection to vaccines has also been removed for families who depend upon social welfare benefits.

The concerns of doctors and other professionals about the safety and efficacy of vaccines are being presented by the International Medical Council on Vaccination  and the World Association for Vaccine Education (WAVE). This website, Vaccination Decisions, is also presenting the scientific information about the lack of safety and efficacy of vaccines (and combination of vaccines used in infants) that is not being presented by governments and mainstream media globally. The Australian government makes policy decisions on behalf of the community and it is important that all the available evidence is used in decisions regarding preventative health. Vaccination is a medical procedure for healthy individuals, not sick individuals yet vaccines are classified as “biological products” not medicines, and this allows them to be approved without the rigorous safety testing that applies to other drugs. A public health policy that uses a medical product to prevent disease should be demonstrated to result in more good than harm before it is implemented in the population. Yet this has not been done with government vaccination policiesAs a major stakeholder in immunisation policy, the public has the right to be fully informed about vaccines and to participate in the decision-making process. The government must also obtain the consent of the community before implementing policies that affect their wellbeing.

A policy that is not open for debate by the public is indoctrination and not a policy that is based on evidence-based medicine that has been properly scrutinised. A description of how the medical literature is being selected for vaccination policies in Australia is given in this presentation at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), 15 October 2015. This was a vaccination forum organised to discuss the public’s concerns about the government’s new mandatory vaccination legislation that was implemnted on 1 January 2016. The video names the 45 government representatives and public health officials that declined to attend this forum to present the case for mandating vaccines in social welfare legislation. The forum was titled Questions and Answers: No Jab No Pay/Play Policy. This presentation explains how this policy is a danger to human health and how it breaches fundamental human rights. It also shows how government’s have reversed the precautionary principle to protect industry interests, and not the public interest, in government vaccination policies. Here is a summary document of the information that government’s are not providing to the public about vaccines in their promotional campaigns to the public ‘Vaccines and “Vaccine Preventable” Disease research. Infectious diseases are an environmental health problem and as such there are many environmental, genetic and lifestyle factors which need to be considered in the reduction of risk from these diseases. The information provided here should not be taken as advice but used to assist in discussions with qualified health professionals. Disclaimer

Do you know what’s in a vaccine ?
  1. Do you know what’s in a vaccine ?
    Our quality of life is dependent upon our health. In a world where we are increasingly exposed to toxins and where our experts are increasingly depending upon industry funding, it is important to know that the information you are receiving is balanced, non-biased and evidence-based. The ingredients of vaccines are not listed on the Immunise Australia Program (IAP) website where they can be easily found. They are found in the Appendix 3 of the Australian Immunisation Handbook (10th Ed). I have also provided a link to the ingredients listed on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website and the World Association for Vaccine Education website.

    Thiomerosal (a 49% mercury compound) has been listed in some vaccines until 2013 (Appendix 4, Australian Immunisation Handbook, 9th Ed). This is significant because the government claimed that thimerosal had been removed from all childhood vaccines by 2000 yet it was still listed in the Hepatitis B vaccine given to infants at birth and the Fluad and Fluarix influenza vaccines until 2013. It was also listed in the Infanrix-hexa vaccine – the new 6 shots in one vaccine in 2010 (Austin et al 2010). Here are some of the other ingredients that are commonly found in vaccines. 

  2. Read More

    This list includes antibiotics, preservatives and additives:

    Aluminium hydroxide

    Aluminium hydroxide/phosphate

    Aluminium phosphate

    Borax (sodium borate – insecticide)

    Egg protein

    Formaldehyde

    Gelatin

    Phenol

    Monosodium glutamate (MSG)

    Phenoxyethanol 

    Thimerosal (50% mercury compound)

    Yeast 

    Antibiotics

    Neomycin 

    Polymxin

    Gentamicin 

    Kanamycin  

  3.  

Australian Government Immunisation Policy
  1. Australian Government Immunisation Policy

    Australia’s National Immunisation Policy is not designed by the Australian government in response to Australian public health needs. Australia’s immunisation policy is based on recommendations provided by public-private partnerships within the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI). This is an alliance that includes pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation and  the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation etc. All partners have equal input into the recommendations for national vaccination programs. GAVI provides advice to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the recommended vaccines are then presented to the 193 WHO member countries. Here is information about Australia’s National Immunisation Program (NIP) and the lack of evidence for its implementation. Over the last two decades parents have become increasingly concerned about the science supporting government immunisation policies as the chronic illness in Australian children has increased 5-fold. Over this time the recommended schedule of vaccines for children has expanded from 7 diseases in the late 1980’s to 16 plus diseases in 2014. This has led many parents and professionals to investigate the science of vaccines and to set up websites presenting information about the risks of this medical intervention to the public. Links to these websites can be accessed on the Pro-Choice In Vaccination page of this website.

  2. Read More

    The science on this website is supported by many doctors and all the science must be included in any public health policy (not selective science) to protect the health of the population. A policy that is not open for debate by the public is indoctrination and not a policy that is based on evidence-based medicine that has been properly scrutinised. Here is a video of Dr. Kenneth Stoller discussing the cover up of the link between vaccines and autism. Here is more scientific information on the vaccine/autism link     

Subscribe to our Newsletter



 

VACCINATION MUST BE A CHOICE
The concerned citizens of Australia do not accept any coercive or mandatory vaccination polices. These policies violate our human right to choose what we put into our own bodies for ‘health’.
To protect the health of the population vaccination policies must remain completely voluntary and without coercion. That is without links to financial incentives or employment situations. This is the position Sweden has adopted because of the known serious health risks of vaccines to many people in genetically diverse populations. One-size medication does not fit all. Sweden has also taken this position because of the known influence of the pharmaceutical companies on the funding and promotion of scientific research to doctors and politicians.
The WA government has recently stated it will support the implementation of the No Jab No Play policy that will require children to be "fully" vaccinated in order to attend government childcare or preschool centres. The current schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines over the last two decades and more vaccines can be added by the government at any time.

The government is putting the lives of infants and adults at risk with coercive and mandatory vaccination policies that allow politicians to decide how many vaccines are injected into the tissues of the human body. This is being done without an open and transparent debate with the public on whom this policy will be enforced and without openly informing consumers (and most health practitioners, doctors and pharmacists) of the ingredients in each vaccine. Many of the ingredients are classified as toxins or neurotoxins.
Vaccines cause adverse events in some children and the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out over $3.6 billion since 1988 to vaccine damaged children. There are many more children that have not received compensation for their injuries and in Australia there is NO compensation scheme for these children. Sweden states that mandatory and coercive vaccination violates a citizen's constitutional rights to choose their own healthcare. This applies to people in all countries and Australians must stand up for our human right to choose our own healthcare.
... See MoreSee Less

Choice in Vaccination Rallies

May 28, 2017, 11:00am - May 28, 2017, 2:00pm

VACCINATION MUST BE A CHOICE The concerned citizens of Australia do not accept any coercive or mandatory vaccination polices. These policies violate our human right to choose what we put into our own bodies for ‘health’. To protect the health of the population vaccination policies must remain completely voluntary and without coercion. That is without links to financial incentives or employment situations. This is the position Sweden has adopted because of the known serious health risks of vaccines to many people in genetically diverse populations. One-size medication does not fit all. Sweden has also taken this position because of the known influence of the pharmaceutical companies on the funding and promotion of scientific research to doctors and politicians. The WA government has recently stated it will support the implementation of the No Jab No Play policy that will require children to be "fully" vaccinated in order to attend government childcare or preschool centres. The current schedule has expanded to 16 vaccines over the last two decades and more vaccines can be added by the government at any time. The government is putting the lives of infants and adults at risk with coercive and mandatory vaccination policies that allow politicians to decide how many vaccines are injected into the tissues of the human body. This is being done without an open and transparent debate with the public on whom this policy will be enforced and without openly informing consumers (and most health practitioners, doctors and pharmacists) of the ingredients in each vaccine. Many of the ingredients are classified as toxins or neurotoxins. Vaccines cause adverse events in some children and the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out over $3.6 billion since 1988 to vaccine damaged children. There are many more children that have not received compensation for their injuries and in Australia there is NO compensation scheme for these children. Sweden states that mandatory and coercive vaccination violates a citizen's constitutional rights to choose their own healthcare. This applies to people in all countries and Australians must stand up for our human right to choose our own healthcare.

View on Facebook

Is this how patients should be treated? www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeP-eIyibQM ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

An evidence-based medical intervention is one that uses evidence from animal studies and vaccinated and unvaccinated patient groups to determine safety before claiming that the intervention is safe. This has not been done for vaccines as there are no vaccine studies that compare the unvaccinated with a truly inert placebo. And many vaccines have been brought in for diseases that did not create 'herd immunity' because they were implemented after the risk of the diseases declined. Natural exposure creates herd immunity not vaccines Talk Host Attacks Vaccine Science using Army Men!?! ... See MoreSee Less

Talk Host Attacks #Vaccine Science using Army Men!?! #HighWire #OhSnap @HighWireTalk @HighWireRadio

View on Facebook

An evidence-based public health policy relies on safety and efficacy studies that are done before the vaccines are recommended to parents - not after they are used in the population. Yet governments are promoting vaccines as being "safe" without investigating the correlation between vaccines and the 5-fold increase in chronic illness in children. This is unethical and it means that governments are relying on retrospective studies with flaws to establish whether the schedule of vaccines that is in current use - is safe. This allows them to ignore this evidence and claim "there is no evidence of harm" even when there clearly is. Here is the Pharmacist Newsletter presenting this information i2p.com.au/safe-vaccination-debate-1-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-new-study-2-judy-wilyman-report/ ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

The event will include a screening of the film 'Vaxxed' that describes how researchers at the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were asked to destroy data that showed a causal link between vaccines and autism in 2004. There will also be a Q and A discussion at the end with health researchers and advocates to discuss parents concerns about vaccination.
Tickets can be bought here www.eventbrite.com.au/e/perth-vaxxed-screening-tickets-33968459577
... See MoreSee Less

Public Screening of Vaxxed: From Cover up to Catastrophe

May 19, 2017, 7:15pm - May 19, 2017, 10:30pm

The event will include a screening of the film 'Vaxxed' that describes how researchers at the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were asked to destroy data that showed a causal link between vaccines and autism in 2004. There will also be a Q and A discussion at the end with health researchers and advocates to discuss parents concerns about vaccination. Tickets can be bought here www.eventbrite.com.au/e/perth-vaxxed-screening-tickets-33968459577

View on Facebook